Ви можете передплатити часопис "Народознавчі зошити" на сайті передплатного агенства "Укрінформнаука".

« 2019. #1 (145)

The Ethnology Notebooks. 2019, 1 (145), 185—198

UDK 069:719:7:902 (477-25:477.41)
DOI https://doi.org/10.15407/nz2019.01.185



ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6833-6462

Postgraduate student,

Kiev National University of Culture and Arts

Str. Yevhen Konovalets, 36, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine

Contacts: e-mail: alla_stepp@ukr.net

Abstract. At the end of the 20th — early 21st centuries changes were made in the creation of artistic and archaeological expositions of capital and peripheral museums, as well as historical and cultural reserves and places of archaeological excavations according to the materials of Kyiv and the region. Previously, there were rather a simple decisions with limited use of expressive and technical means, for instance, created half a century ago the expositions of national museums: Ukrainian Folk Decorative Art; History of Ukraine; Archaeological Museum of the National Academy of Sciences, etc. In recent years, we have modern examples of the transformation of the entire museum space, which already meets the principles of integrated design. The directions of further development of museum design in the defined field are described.

Keywords: archeology, museum design, exposition design, Kyiv, Kyiv region.

Received 23.01.2019


Wajdaher, F. (2005). General Museology: A Guide.Transl. from the German by X. Nazarkevich, O. Liang, V. Lozynsky. Lviv: Chronicle [in Ukrainian].
Ivleva, V. P. (2008). Methodical recommendations for the museum design of immovable monuments of science and technology. Kyiv. Institute of Memorial Research Works. Issue 2. P. 14—28 [in Ukrainian].
Petrashenko, V.O. (2018, august 10). Actual problems of modern research and conservation of archaeological heritage [in Ukrainian].
Safonova, T.R. (2012). Design-means of informational saturation in the creation of the exposition. Bulletin of the Kharkiv State Academy of Design and Art, 6, 44—48 [in Ukrainian].
Yurieneva, T.Yu. (2003). Museology: a textbook for higher education. Moscow: Academic project [in Russian].
Yakovets, I.O. (2011). Museum exposition: basic concepts and methods. Bulletin of the Kharkiv State Academy of Design and Arts, 1, 147—150 [in Ukrainian].
Yakovets, I.O. (2012). Exhibition equipment for museums and exhibitions: description of the main types. Design, design education, 15, 46—51 [in Ukrainian].
Aseev, Yu.S., Sikorsky, M.I., Kharlamov, V.A. (1979). Research of the Mikhailovsky Cathedral in Pereyaslav-Khmelnitsky. Slavs and Rus. Anthology of scientific works. Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute of Archeology. Kyiv: Scientific thought. P. 122—137 [in Russian].
Ivakin, G.Yu., Klimovsky S.I. (1999). Problems of protection of archaeological monuments in Kyiv. Archeometry and the protection of historical and cultural heritage. Issue 3. Kyiv. P. 111—115 [in Ukrainian].
Sahaydak, M.A. (1991). Ancient «Podil» — lower part of Kyiv. Kyiv: Science thought [in Ukrainian].
Tolochko, P.P., Gupalo, K.M., Kharlamov, V.O. (1976). Excavations of the Kyiv’ Podil in 1973. Archaeological researches of ancient Kyiv. Kyiv. P. 19—47 [in Ukrainian].
Drobyshev, A.N. (2011). Museum park as a form of presentation of the archaeological heritage. (Master’s thesis). Tyumen. [in Russian].
Zhukova, O. (2013). Museum park as a form of presentation of the archaeological heritage in Ukraine (on the example of the cultural and archaeological complex «Peresopnytsia»). The nineteenth Sumtsov reading. Materials of scientific conf. «Museum as a socio-cultural institute in the conditions of the information society». Kharkiv, April 18, 2013. Kharkiv Historical Museum. Kharkiv: Maidan. S. 25—32. [in Ukrainian].
Zhukova, O. (2013). Creation of archaeoparks as an element of the museum landscape in Ukraine (cultural and archaeological center «Peresopnytsia»). Sivershchyna in the history of Ukraine: Anthology of scientific works. Issue 6. Kyiv: Center for the Study of Memorials in the National Academy of Sciences. P. 17—21 [in Ukrainian].
Medved Alexander. (1999). Museafication of the medieval archeological monuments. (Master’s thesis). Moscow (Russian Institute for Cultural Studies, Ministry of the Culture, Russian Federation) [in Russian].
Sahaydak, Mykhaylo. (2005). Problems of Museafication of Archeological monuments. Ant. Issue 13—15. P. 44—59 [in Ukrainian].
Safonova, T.R. (2015). Introduction of archaeological heritage in the modern planning system of the city. Anthology of scientific reports. Warszawa: Sp. z o.o. Diamond trading tour [in Ukrainian].
Safonova, T.R. (2012). Modern possibilities of design in the interpretation of archaeological sites. III International Scientific and Practical Conference «The Facets of Modern Science». Krasnodar: Premier. P. 8—13 [in Russian].
Safonova, T.R. (2012). Creation of the exhibition by design means as a way of preserving archaeological finds in Crakow. International scientific and practical conference «Scientific researches of the present». Issue 5. Kyiv: NAIRI. P. 56—57 [in Ukrainian].
Brich, Maria. (2015). Museumization of architectural monuments and urban planning as a means of preserving the historical and cultural heritage. Historical and cultural studios (Lviv Polytechnic), 1, 31—35 (Volume 2) [in Ukrainian].
Safonova, T.R. (2012). Design of the urban environment with the introduction of elements of architectural archeology. Scientifical and practical conference . «Development and reconstruction of territorial systems and settlements in the region of Western Ukraine». Lviv: Rastr-7. P. 32 [in Ukrainian].
Safonova, T.R. (2013). Elements of architectural and archeological monuments in the design of the urban environment. Collection of scientific works on materials of the 4th International confeerence for Young Scientists «Problems of Research, Preservation and Restoration of Historical Fortifications». Lviv: Polytechnic. P. 128—132 [in Ukrainian].
Lohvitsky, Kondrat. (2004). Journals and cases on the disclosure of antiquities in Kiev from 1824 to 1938. Kiev album. Historical almanac. Issue 3. Kyiv. P. 25—30 [in Russian].
Ananieva, T. (2013). Between the divine and the profane: the forgotten find of the 1830s was the Kiev’ «Cross» of the Apostle Andrew the First-Called. Sophia of Kiev: Byzantium. Rus. Ukraine. The collection of scientific works devoted to the 150th birthday of Yegor Kuzmich Radin (1863—1908). Kiev. P. 256—270 [in Russian].
Anan’eva, T. (2003). «Expeditions» by Kondrat Lokhvitsky (from the Kiev correspondence of the archaeologist in the 1830s). Dnipropetrovsk Historical and Archaeological Collection. Issue 3. Dnipropetrovsk. P. 248—280 [in Russian].
Skory, S. A. (1990). Kurgan Perepyatikha (to the ethnocultural history of the Dnipro Forest-Steppe Right Bank). Kiev: Scientific thought [in Ukrainian].
Tarasyuk, Galina. (2010, November 4). Cossack Berezan. Word of Enlightenment (Slovo Prosvity) [(in Ukrainian]
Archaeological Museum. (2003). Culture. History. Traditions, 2, 15—19 [in Ukrainian].
Buzyan, G.M. (without year). Archaeological Museum of the National Historical and Ethnographic Reserve «Pereyaslav». Materials of NIEZ «Pereyaslav». P. 1—2.
Kolybenko, O., Pavlenko, S. (2011). Little-known pages of museum’ affairs history in Pereyaslav area: Pereyaslavsky Archaeological Museum. Scientific notes on Ukrainian history: Collection of scientific articles. Issue 26. Pereyaslav-Khmelnitsky [in Ukrainian].
Sahaydak, Mykhailo (2009). New data on the fortifications of the «City of Yaroslav» (based on archaeological researches in 1981 and 2001). Fortress. Anthology of the reserve «Tustan». Lviv [in Ukrainian].
Sagaidak, M. (2018, march 4). «For our attitude to archeology, we belong to the modern Barbaricum». Mikhail Sagaidak, director of the Center for Archeology of Kyiv at the Archeology Institute of the National Academy of Sciences, interlocutor of Mykola Knyazhitsky, about Ukrainian archeology in the International Year of Preservation of the Historic Heritage. March 4, 2018. Retrieved from: https://espreso.tv/article/2018/03/04/mykhaylo_sagaydak (Apply Date: 08/27/2018) [in Ukrainian].
Selivachov, M., Sagaidak, M (2014). Are compatible ecclesiastical and secular culture, temple and museum? Orthodoxy in Ukraine. Collection of materials to the 4th International Scientific Conference, November 18—19. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Titova, O.M. (2004). Problems of Museumication of Archeology. Memorials of Ukraine (M-I of the International Scientific and Practical Conference «Pedagogical and Recreational Technologies in the Modern Leisure Industry». Kyiv. Retrieved from: http://tourlib.net/statti_ukr /tytova.htm (Appointment Date: 10.08.2018) [in Ukrainian].
Kharlamov, V (1994). On the issue of the creation of the Museum of Kievan Rus in Pereyaslav. Theses of Allukrainian scientific conf. «Pereyaslav land and its place in the development of Ukrainian nation, statehood and culture». Pereyaslav-Khm. [in Ukrainian].
A private museum of Trypillian culture was closed (2012, July 25th). Ukrainian Pravda. 2012. July 25th. Retrieved from: www.istpravda.com.ua (application date: 10.09.2018) [in Ukrainian].
Cultural heritage of Kiev: Research and Protection of the Historical Environment. Michael’s Golden-domed Monastery. Anniversary edition devoted to the 800th anniversary (2008). Kyiv: Phoenix [in Ukrainian].
Maruschak, Alexander (2013, October 7th). An underground city will be built on Podol. Today (Segodnya, Kyiv).
A collapse occurred at excavations on Poshtova Square (2015, March 31). Retrieved from: http://kiev.pravda.com.ua/news/5502adba149b7/ 13.03.2015 (date of appeal: 12.09.2018).
Selivachov, M., Sagaidak, M. (1985. June 23). The lake is under threat (1985, June 23). Culture and life (Kultura i zhyttya, Kyiv), 25 (2781), 8 [in Ukrainian].
Selivachov, M., Sagaidak, M. (1986, march 16). Returning to the published. The lake is under threat. Culture and life (Kultura i zhyttya, Kyiv), 11 (2819), 8 [in Ukrainian].
Sagaidak, M. (2018). Gorodets Pisochny (Miloslavichi). Princes Olekkovichi-Slutskii. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Kislyakov, K., Rоssoshynska, N., & Selivachov, M. (2000). «Ukrainian Inter-Museum Center» was founded. Ant. Issue 4—6, 87. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].


Наші автори
Особливості формування ідентифікаційного простору України наприкінці ХХ — на поч. ХХІ ст.: конфесійний аспект
У статті розглядаються особливості формування ідентифікаційного простору України кін. ХХ — поч. XXI ст., зокрема аналізуються перспективи участі Церкви у становленні української громадянської нації в умовах поліконфесійного суспільства. Автор намагається поєднати макроі мікропідходи, приділяючи особливу увагу аналізу повсякденного життєвого досвіду сучасних українців із широким використанням авторських емпіричних досліджень.
Читати »

Польові дослідження російських і білоруських етнологів та етнолінгвістів на теренах Полісся України у 1945—1980-х рр.
На великому літературному матеріалі комплексно охарактеризовано польові дослідження території Полісся України, проведені в 1945—1980-х рр. співробітниками російських і білоруських етнологічних осередків, а також московськими етнолінгвістами та представниками інших народознавчих центрів Росії, України та Білорусі у рамках реалізації програми «Полесского этнолингвистического атла­са». Особлива увага звернена на їхню географію, методику проведення, тематику та наукові результати.
Читати »

Хто ж записав «Народнїй калєндар у Ровенськім повітї Волинської губернії»?
На основі аналізу наукового доробку і творчого шляху Василя Доманицького доводиться: дослідник ніколи не відвідував Рівненський повіт Волинської губернії, отже й не збирав етнографічні та фольклорні матеріали на його території. «Народнїй калєндар у Ровенськім повітї…» та інші етнографічні праці, що стосуються традиційно-побутової культури населення цього краю, вчений підготував на основі народознавчих джерел, які в середині XIX ст. зібрав Василь Абрамович — священик села Яполоті, нині Костопільського району Рівненської області.
Читати »